مطالعات زن و خانواده

پیش‌بینی دلزدگی زناشویی زوجین بر اساس اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه بالینی و سلامت دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران ، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه بالینی و سلامت دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی ، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

3 گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیش‌بینی دلزدگی زناشویی زوجین براساس اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی در سال 1399-1398 انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، شامل تمامی زوجین ساکن شهر تهران در سال 1399 است. در پژوهشی با روش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، نمونه‌ای به حجم 240 نفر (120 زوج) از میان تمامی زوجین ساکن منطقه چهار شهر تهران به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترسِ هدف‌مند انتخاب شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان در مطالعه، پرسشنامه دلزدگی زناشویی پاینز (1996)، پرسشنامه اهمال‌کاری تاکمن (1991) و نیمرخ سبک زندگی ارتقادهنده سلامت والکر، سچریت و پندر (1995) را تکمیل نمودند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیری حاکی از آن است که بین سبک زندگی با اهمال‌کاری به صورت نزولی، رابطه منفی وجود دارد. بین دلزدگی زناشویی با اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی به ترتیب به صورت صعودی و نزولی (مثبت و منفی) از لحاظ آماری رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. بنابراین با توجه به نتایج به دست آمده، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی، به صورت معناداری دلزدگی زناشویی زوجین را پیش‌بینی می‌کنند. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان از اهمیت سبک زندگی سالم در تعدیل رابطه مثبت بین دلزدگی زناشویی و اهمال‌کاری دارد.

تازه های تحقیق

نتایج حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیری حاکی از آن است که بین سبک زندگی با اهمال‌کاری به صورت نزولی، رابطه منفی وجود دارد. بین دلزدگی زناشویی با اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی به ترتیب به صورت صعودی و نزولی (مثبت و منفی) از لحاظ آماری رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. بنابراین با توجه به نتایج به دست آمده، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که اهمال‌کاری و سبک زندگی، به صورت معناداری دلزدگی زناشویی زوجین را پیش‌بینی می‌کنند. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان از اهمیت سبک زندگی سالم در تعدیل رابطه مثبت بین دلزدگی زناشویی و اهمال‌کاری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Predicting the Couple's Marital Burnout Based on Procrastination and Lifestyle

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahla Amerehei borcheloei 1
  • Abolghasem Khoshkonesh 2
  • Hajar Falahzade 3

1 Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Health, Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Science and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted with the aim of predicting the Couple's Marital Burnout based on Procrastination and Lifestyle in 2019-2020. The statistical population of the present study includes all couples living in Tehran in 2020. In a descriptive correlational study, 240 samples (120 couples) were selected by using the available sampling method and completed the Pinez's Marital Burnout Questionnaire (1996), the Tuckman's Procrastination Questionnaire (1991) and the Profile of Health Promotion Lifestyle (Walker, Sechrist & Pender, 1995). The results of Multivariate Regression Analysis indicated that there is a negative relationship between Lifestyle and Procrastination in couples. There is a significant positive and negative relationship between Marital Burnout with Procrastination and Lifestyle respectively in couples. Therefore, according to the results, it can be concluded that Procrastination and Lifestyle significantly predict the Couple's Marital Burnout. The findings of this study show the importance of Healthy Lifestyle in moderating the positive relationship between Marital Burnout and Procrastination.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Marital Burnout
  • Procrastination
  • Lifestyle

Background and purpose

Marital burnout is a painful state of fatigue, physical, mental, and emotional exhaustion and affects couples who expect ideal love to give meaning to their lives (Kebritchi & Mohammadkhani, 2016). This condition occurs when couples realize that despite their efforts, their relationship with their lives will not have any special meaning (Asgari & Goodarzi, 2018). Recognizing the factors affecting marital burnout is one of the priorities. One of the variables related to couples' marital burnout is procrastination (Raisi, 2016). Thus, procrastination, along with other factors, can lead to dissatisfaction with marital relationships and, consequently, marital burnout. Procrastination means neglecting, evading, delaying, and postponing to the future the tasks and goals we have decided to pursue (Steel & Ferrari, 2013). Procrastination in relation to marital issues means delaying or avoiding the responsibilities and duties that each man and woman commit to after marriage (Mohammadi & Abdi, 2018). Previous research has shown that procrastination can negatively affect couples' relationships (Raisi, 2016; Mohammadi & Abdi, 2018). Since healthy interpersonal relationships are a component of lifestyle, procrastination can also negatively affect various aspects of a couple's lifestyle. A health-promoting lifestyle focuses on improving the quality of life through a lifestyle that includes the six dimensions of physical activity, nutrition, health responsibility, spiritual growth, interpersonal relationships, and stress management. This lifestyle promotes health and happiness and leads to satisfaction in various aspects of life and self-healing (Jalili Bahabadi et al., 2020). In general, it can be said that the study of marital burnout of couples and various elements affecting it, including procrastination and lifestyle, can lead to preventive policies and support of family, especially women. Therefore, the present study seeks to examine this hypothesis: "marital burnout of couples is predictable based on procrastination and lifestyle."

 

Method

The present study was a descriptive correlational study. The population consists of all couples living in the 4th district of Tehran in 2020, of which 120 couples were selected through the available sampling method.

Marital Burnout Questionnaire: This questionnaire is a self-report instrument developed by Pines (1996) to measure marital burnout. This questionnaire consists of 21 items that indicate burnout syndrome and has three main components; 1). Physical exhaustion 2). Emotional exhaustion and 3). Mental exhaustion.

Tuckman's Procrastination Assessment Questionnaire: This questionnaire is a 16-item self-report scale designed by Tuckman to measure procrastination in 1991 and is objectively graded and interpreted.

Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II): This questionnaire is a 52-item self-report scale designed to measure Health-Promoting lifestyles by Walker, Sechrist, and Pender in 1987 and includes six subscales of Health Responsibility, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Spiritual Growth, Interpersonal Relationships, and Stress Management.

 

Results

Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation and multivariate regression analysis.

According to the results of Table 1, because the calculated F for all predictor variables is greater than the critical value of F (with df 7 and 232 and a significance level of p <.01), then the null hypothesis is rejected. Given the rejection of the null hypothesis, it can be concluded that lifestyle and procrastination are predictors of marital burnout.

Table 1.

Results of linear regression in predicting marital burnout based on procrastination and lifestyle

Criterion variable

Group

Sources Change

Sum of squares

Df

Mean squares

F

Sig.

The total score of marital burnout

Women

Regression

75.47

7

10.78

10.85

.000

Residual

111.25

112

.99

    

Total

186.71

119

      

Men

Regression

65.47

7

9.35

8.21

.000

Residual

127.55

112

1.14

    

Total

193.02

119

      

Total

Regression

132.15

7

18.88

17.60

.000

Residual

248.83

232

1.07

    

Total

380.98

239

      

 

The results of Table 2. show the significance of predictor variables' effect on the criterion variable through t-test. Effects with a value of t greater than 1.96 are considered significant. According to the results, calculated t for the predictor variables of procrastination, physical activity, and spiritual growth is greater than the critical value of t (at the significance level of .05), so the null hypothesis is rejected, and it can be concluded with 95% confidence that these variables are effective in predicting marital burnout.

Table 2.

Standardized and unstandardized regression coefficients, t-test, and linearity of predictor variables

   

Unstandardized coefficients

Standardized coefficients

T-test

Sig

Criterion

Predictive components

B

Std.Error

Beta

Marital burnout

Constant

3.42

0.65

  

5.27

.00

Procrastination

.59

.13

.28

4.46

.00

Health Responsibility

-.08

.15

-.04

-.54

.59

Physical Activity

-.35

.11

-.23

-3.09

.00

Nutrition

-.02

.19

-.01

-.11

.92

Spiritual Growth

-.63

.15

-.33

-4.09

.00

Interpersonal Relations

-.20

.17

-.09

-1.19

.23

Stress Management

.01

.19

-.01

-.08

.94

 

Conclusion

The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between marital burnout and procrastination. Since procrastinating people have a great desire to procrastinate in starting and ending a relationship, they have no desire to perform the duties and responsibilities related to the marital relationship or are less inclined to get married and doing the responsibilities that come with it. Over time, this leads to a vicious cycle between procrastination and marital problems and causes problems in the relationship with the spouse. In the long run, the marital relationship is seriously disrupted and leads to dissatisfaction and marital burnout. The results also showed that there is a significant negative relationship between marital burnout and lifestyle. A couple's lifestyle based on cooperation and shared goals and aspirations leads to a life with marital satisfaction. Also, by changing and modifying their lifestyle, incompatible and burnt-out couples can put aside their selfish and inefficient tendencies and choose goals with high prosocial tendencies. Therefore, an appropriate and adult couple lifestyle can increase the understanding of the spouses and lead to satisfaction in various aspects of life and, consequently, prevent marital burnout and dissatisfaction.

 

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines 

All subjects participated in the study by filling out a consent form, and the researchers assured them that their identity was kept confidential.

Funding: The study was conducted at the personal expense of researchers.

Authors' contribution: In conducting this research, the first author was responsible for data collection, writing the article; The second author supervised the study and reviewed the paper. The third author was responsible for the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest: This research is not in conflict with personal or organizational interests.

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank all the participants in this study.

منابع فارسی
بهاری، زهرا. (1394). نقش سبک زندگی در رضایت زناشویی زوجین. فرهنگ مشاوره و روان­درمانی، 6 (22)، 145-125.
پاینز، آیالامالاچ. (1996). دلزدگی از روابط زناشویی. ترجمه سیدحبیب گوهری­راد و کامران افشار. (1398)، تهران: نشر رادمهر، 11-10.
پورمیدانی، سمیه؛ نوری، ابوالقاسم؛ شفتی، سید عباس. (1393). رابطه سبک زندگی با رضایت زناشویی. خانواده‌پژوهی، 10 (39)، 344-331.
خضری، سیده خدیجه؛ ارجمند سیاهپوش، اسحق. (1393). مقایسه میزان رضایت از زندگی زناشویی زنان شاغل و خانه­دار و عوامل موثر بر آن در شهر ایذه، مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 6 (4)، 105-97.
ربیعی، محمد؛ خسروی­علیا، طیبه. (1394). بررسی میزان رعایت سبک زندگی اسلامی زناشویی در زوجین شهرکرد. کنگره ملی خانواده سالم، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
رئیسی، شیما. (1395). نقش واسطه­ای اهمال­کاری در رابطه بین ابعاد کمال­گرایی و مشکلات زناشویی. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان­شناسی، دانشگاه تهران.
شکری، امید؛ تمیزی، نوشین؛ پورشهریار، حسین؛ عبدالله­پور، محمد آزاد؛ اخوی، زهره‌سادات؛ لواف، هانیه. (1394). ویژگی­های روان­سنجی نسخه دوم نیمرخ سبک زندگی ارتقادهنده سلامت در دانشجویان. اندازه گیری تربیتی، 6 (21)، 60-41.
شعاع‌کاظمی، مهرانگیز. (1396). خشونت خانوادگی، دلزدگی زناشویی و احساس ارزش­مندی در زنان عادی و مراجعه­کننده به دادگاه خانواده تهران. مطالعات زن و خانواده، 5 (1)، 52-35.
کاظمی، مصطفی؛ فیاضی، مرجان؛ کاوه، منیژه. (1389). بررسی میزان شیوع تعلل و عوامل موثر بر آن در بین مدیران و کارکنان دانشگاه. پژوهشنامه مدیریت تحول. 2 (4)، 34-20.
محمدی، هیوا؛ عبدی، مجید. (1397). مقایسه اهمال­کاری زناشویی و دلزدگی زناشویی در بین زنان شاغل و زنان خانه­دار شهر بانه. همایش ملی روان­شناسی و سلامت-با محوریت خانواده و زندگی سالم، دانشگاه شیراز.
References
Ahmadi, K., Etemadi, A., Fathi-Ashtiani, A., & Shokooh, N. N. (2007). Effect of intervention to change life style to increase marital adjustment. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7, 2430-2436. https://doi. 10.3923/jas.2007.2430.2436 [Link]
Asgari, A., & Goodarzi, K. (2018). The effectiveness of Emotional Schema Therapy on marital burnout on the Brink of Divorce. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies, 8, 55-55. [Link]
Jalili Bahabadi, F. J., Estebsari, F., Rohani, C., Kandi, Z. R. K., Sefidkar, R., & Mostafaei, D. (2020). Predictors of health-promoting lifestyle in pregnant women based on Pender’s health promotion model. International Journal of Women's Health, 12, 71. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S235169 [Link]
Bahari, Z. (2015). The role of lifestyle in marital satisfaction of couples. Quarterly of Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy, 6 (22), 125-145 (text in Persian). https://doi. 10.22054/QCCPC.2015.4212 [Link]
Jafari, A., Alami, A., Charoghchian, E., Noghabi, A. D., & Nejatian, M. (2021). The impact of effective communication skills training on the status of marital burnout among married women. BMC Women's Health, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01372-8 [Link]
Kazemi, M., Fayazi, M., Kaveh, M. (2010). Investigation of procrastination prevalence and its causes among university managers and employees. Journal of Transformation Management. 2 (4), 20-34 (text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/PMT.V2I4.9078 [Link]
Kebritchi, A., & Mohammadkhani, S. (2016). The role of marital burnout and early maladaptive schemas in marital satisfaction between young couples. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 5(12), 239-246. [Link]
Khezri, S. K., & Arjmand Siahpoush, E. (2014). The comparison of marital satisfaction level of working and householder women and affecting factors on them in Izeh city. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies (JISDS), 6 (4), 97-105 (text in Persian). [Link]
Miller, J., & Tedder, B. (2012). The discrepancy between expectations and reality: Satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583. [Link]
Mohammadi, H., & Abdi, M. (2018). Comparison of marital procrastination and marital burnout among working women and housewives in Baneh. National Conference on Psychology and Health-Focus on Family and Healthy Living, Shiraz University (text in Persian). [Link]
Najafi, A. (2016). The relationship between personality traits, irrational beliefs and Couple Burnout. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-7. [Link]
Nejatian, M., Alami, A., Momeniyan, V., Noghabi, A. D., & Jafari, A. (2021). Investigating the status of marital burnout and related factors in married women referred to health centers. BMC Women's Health, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01172-0 [Link]
Ortega, E., Ramirez-Baena, L., la Fuente-Solana, D., Emilia, I., Vargas, C., & Gómez-Urquiza, J. L. (2018). Gender, marital status, and children as risk factors for burnout in nurses: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102102 [Link]
Pines, A. (1996). Marital Burnout. Translated by Seyed Habib Gohari Rad and Kamran Afshar. (2019), Tehran: Radmehr Publishing, 10-11 (text in Persian). [Link]
Pourmeidani, S., Noori, A., & Shafti, A. (2014). Relationship between life style and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Research, 10 (3), 44-331 (text in Persian). [Link]
Rabiee, M., Khosravi olia, T. (2015). A study of the observance of Islamic marital lifestyle in Shahrekord couples. National Congress of Healthy Families, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (text in Persian). [Link]
Raisi, Sh. (2016). The mediating role of procrastination in the relationship between the dimensions of perfectionism and marital problems. Master's thesis in Psychology, University of Tehran (text in Persian). [Link]
Shokri, O., Tamizi, N., Porshahriyar, H., Abdullahpour, M. A., Akhavi, Z. S., Lavaf, H. (2015). Psychometric Properties of Health-Promoting life Profile-II among university Students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6 (21), 41-60 (text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22054/JEM.2015.3900 [Link]
Shoakazemi, M. (2017). Relationship & comparative family violence, couple burnout, self-esteem in normal and client women to court in Tehran city. Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 5(1), 35-52 (text in Persian). https://doi.org/ 10.22051/JWFS.2017.5331. [Link]
Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. (2013). Sex, education and procrastination: An epidemiological study of procrastinators' characteristics from a global sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1851 [Link]
Tuckman, B. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512022 [Link]
Walker, S. N., Kerr, M. J., Pender, N. J., & Sechrist, K. R. (1990). A Spanish Language Version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile. Nursing Research, 39(5), 268-273. [Link]
Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1987). The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing research, 36(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002 [Link]
Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1995). Health promotion model-instruments to measure health promoting lifestyle: Health-promoting lifestyle profile [HPLP II] (Adult version). https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/85349 [Link]
Wallerstein, J. (2019). The good marriage: How and why love lasts. Plunkett Lake Press. [Link]
Whisman, M. A., Sbarra, D. A., & Beach, S. R. (2021). Intimate relationships and depression: searching for causation in the sea of association. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 233-258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-103323 [Link]
مطالعات زن و خانواده
دوره 9، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 22
آذر 1400
صفحه 129-155