روایت زنان زندانی از علل و زمینه های معاونت در قتل عمد همسر و رابطة نامشروع

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دکترا جامعه شناسی فرهنگی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیارگروه جامعه شناسی فرهنگی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکزی،تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه جامعه شناسی فرهنگی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران.

10.22051/jwfs.2021.32487.2497

چکیده

یکی از مهمترین مسائلی که در حوزة جرایم خانوادگی اتفاق می افتد، همسرکشی است که در آن مرد یا زن، همسر خود را به قتل می رساند. همسرکشی علاوه بر تأثیرات خانوادگی، پیامدهای منفی بر جامعه به جا می گذارد. این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل روایت زنان زندانی از «علل و زمینه های معاونت در قتل عمد همسر و رابطة نامشروع» سعی بر یافتن علل مؤثر بر همسرکشی دارد. تحقیق حاضر با اتخاذ رویکردی کیفی و با استفاده از تکنیک مشاهده و مصاحبة عمیق به روایت 13 نفر از زنانی که به جرم معاونت در قتل عمد همسر و رابطة نامشروع در ندامتگاه شهر ری زندانی بوده‌اند پرداخته است. یافته های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد همسر کشی زندانیان در بستری فرهنگی، اجتماعی رخ داده است، به این معنا که مجموعة عواملی در زندگی آن ها در کنارهم قرار گرفته که منجر به بروز این اتفاق گردیده است که مهمترین آن ها عبارت است از نارضایتی جنسی زن، خشونت خانگی، دغدغه های ذهنی زن نسبت به طلاق، نوع و شیوة ازدواج و اعتیاد مرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Narrated women prisoners about the causes and contexts of the deputy in the premeditated murder of her husband and illegitimate relationship

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahtab Mafi 1
  • Hossin fekrazad 2
  • Amir masoud Amir mazaheri 3

1 PhD student in Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, IranPhD student in Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Centeral Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Centeral Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

One of the most important problems in the field of domestic crime is spousal murder in which a man or woman kills his wife or her husband. In addition to family effects, spousal murder has negative consequences for society.The aim of this study is to analyze th narrative of women prisoners about the causes and contexts of the deputy in the intentional murder of her husband and the illegitimate relationship, and to try to find the effective reasons for the murder of her husband.
The present study has taken a qualitative approach and using the technique of observation and in-depth interviews, has narrated the story of 13 women who were convicted of assisting in the intentional murder of their husbands and having an illicit relationship in the Rey City Penitentiary. Research findings show that the murder of prisoners took place in a socio cultural context, in the sense that a set of factors in their lives were put together that led to this occurrence that the most important of which are female Sexual dissatisfaction, domestic violence, female mental concerns about divorce, type and manner of marriage and male addiction.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • women prisoners
  • Intentional homicide
  • Domestic Violence
  • Illegal relationship

Extended abstract

Background and purpose

One of the most critical issues in domestic crime is spousal murder, in which a man or woman kills his or her spouse. In addition to family effects, spousal murder has negative consequences for society. In this situation, it is not only men and women who are harmed, but also with the collapse of the family, children will also be victims and will face many problems. Not only the couple's relationship will be harmed, but also, with the collapse of the family, children will be victimized and face many problems. It is impossible to determine the most crucial factor for spousal murder because several factors are involved in this event. The wife's continued dissatisfaction and helplessness in getting out of it are mentioned as the main factors, in such a way that wife has decided to remove her husband physically. The increase in family homicides, especially spousal murder, is a sign of an important social issue in recent years. In this regard, although no accurate statistics are available, the increase in family homicides has been enough to be considered a social problem. Although the despicable phenomenon of spousal murder is affected by various psychological, economic, and socio-cultural factors, in this study, we aimed to analyze women prisoners' narrative of social and cultural causes of abetting in the premeditated murder of their husband.

 

Method

This is an applied study in terms of purpose and considered qualitative in terms of methodology. This study used a narrative analysis of 13 Imprisoned women in the penitentiary of Shahr-e-Rey who were accused of abetting the murder of their husband and illicit relationship in 2018. An unstructured interview was implemented in which Imprisoned women were asked to tell the story of what happened in a narrative way and explain everything they see as the cause, consequence, their feelings about the subject, and their experience in that event. The interview proceeded in such a way that nothing from the researcher's preconceptions was instilled in the participants, and they tell the story from their point of view.

Thus, the structure of the interview was designed based on the family atmosphere of the participants before marriage, the method of mate selection, the woman's relationship with her husband and their problems, the reason for the murder, the way they got involved with their extramarital partner, and the kind of relationship between them. The interviews lasted an average of forty-five minutes to an hour, and interviews ended when the researcher ensured that the participants have provided duplicate codes and have nothing new to say. In this research, a narrative analysis technique was used to analyze the data. To collect demographic data such as age, educational status, etc., we used the personality file of the defendants, which includes individual and social characteristics.

 

Results

Results indicated that the average age of the interviewees was 38, with the youngest 30 years old and the oldest 52 years old. Ten Women were housewives, and three were employed. Eleven participants were Iranian, and two of these were Afghan citizens. All the women were married legally, and none of them had a criminal record. In other words, their first criminal record was the murder of their husbands. The victims were killed with cold weapons or strangled, and no firearms were used in the murders. Most of these murders were committed at home, and they had already prepared the murder weapon and informed the killer when their husbands were at home. In most cases, the bodies were taken out of the house after the murder and left or burned around Tehran.

The spousal murder by these women has taken place in a cultural and social context, meaning that a set of factors accumulated that have led to the event. The most critical factors are women's sexual dissatisfaction, domestic violence, women's preoccupation with divorce, marriage type, and husband addiction.

 

 conclusion

In this study, we analyzed narratives of 13 women who engaged in an extramarital relationship and abetted in the premeditated murder of their husband. Women' Sexual dissatisfaction was one of the leading causes of the premeditated murder of a husband, which originates from factors such as the husband's neglect of the wife's sexual needs, husband extramarital relationship with other women, and sexual deviations in a husband. Husband's addiction is one factor that, directly and indirectly, contributed to wife's sexual dissatisfaction and domestic violence. Women's preoccupation with divorce, age difference between spouses, forced marriage, and domestic violence are other factors affecting the premeditated murder of her husband. Our results are consistent with Izi (2015), Vahida et al. (2015), Ghazinejad and Abbasian (2011), Aghabakhshi (2009), Javidi and Tarzi (2008), Moazami (2004), Ashouri and Moazami (2002), and Aldridge and Browne (2003). Izi (2015) found that contextual factors such as age, education, place of residence, and marrying at a young age by girls are important and consistent with our results that indicate the imprisoned women have a significant age difference from their murdered husbands. According to Ghazinejad and Abbasian (2011), psychological and social pressures on women, such as beatings and humiliation by their husbands, weak social support networks, are influential factors and are consistent with our results that indicate the lack of family support for women and domestic violence as important variables. Research shows that marriage at a young age by wife and the low economic status of the victims' family of origins (Aghabakhshi, 2009), lack of interest in the husband, lack of commitment, the moral degeneration of the husband (Javidi & Tarzi 2008), Infidelity or illicit relationship by a husband (Moazami, 2004), marriage at a young age, a forced and unwanted marriage, restrictive laws regarding divorce applications for women (Ashouri and Moazami, 2002), and drug and alcohol use are salient factors in committing spousal murder by women. Previous research confirms our results that indicate forced marriage, spouse' indifference to each other, wife sexual dissatisfaction, and Husband sexual perversion, an extramarital sexual relationship of a murdered husband, the taboo of divorce and wife preoccupation with divorce, and direct or indirect effects of drugs have all contributed to spousal murderer by women.

 

Ethical consideration

This study was conducted under the ethical codes of human research.

Authors contributions: Hossein Fekrazad is the corresponding author, Mahtb Mafi is the second author, and the third author, Mr. Amir Massoud Amir Mazaheri is responsible for writing the article.

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare, and this article has never been published before.

منابع فارسی
اقتصاد آنلاین. (7/7/1398). فقر و بیکاری، عامل افزایش خشونت در خانواده ها کدخبر: 384088، به نشانی: https://www.eghtesadonline.com/n/1uAC
امین صارمی، نوذر. (1398). بررسی بسترها و زمینه های اجتماعی وقوع قتل های خانوادگی (مورد مطالعه شهر تهران). پژوهشگاه علوم انتظامی و مطالعات اجتماعی ناجا.
ایزی، الهه سادات. (1394). تحلیل جامعه شناختی قتل های خانوادگی با تأکید بر همسرکشی در بین جوانان. فصلنامه دانش انتظامی خراسان شمالی. 7 (2): 100- 81.
آشوری، محمد؛ معظمی، شهلا. (1381). نگاهی به پدیدۀ همسرکشی در استان فارس. فصلنامه حقوق دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران. 58 (0) :32- 11.
آقابخشی، حبیب. (1388). وضعیت زندگی زنان متهم به قتل شوهر (رویکرد مددکاری اجتماعی). فصلنامه پژوهش اجتماعی. 2(3): 28 -13.
آقابیگلویی، عباس؛ آقاخانی، کامران. (1379). بررسی پدیده همسرآزاری در شهر تهران سال 1379. مجموعه مقالات آسیب‌های اجتماعی. تهران انتشارات آگاه.   
جاوید، نورمحمد؛ طرزی، تقی. (بهار 1387). بررسی پدیده همسرکشی زنان. مجله مطالعات امنیت اجتماعی.1(13):170-149.                                     
ذکایی، محمدسعید. (1387). روایت، روایت گری و تحلیل های شرح حال نگارانه. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی.1(8): 98-69 .
صابریان، معصومه؛ آتش نفس، الهه؛ بهنام، بهناز و حقیقت، شهلا. (بهار 1383). بررسی عوامل موثر در بروز خشونت خانگی و روش های مقابله با آن از دیدگاه زنان مراجعه کننده به مراکز بهداشتی ـ درمانی شهرستان سمنان در سال 1382. مجله علمی پزشکی قانونی.10(33): 34-30.
صدیق سروستانی، رحمت الله. (1382). آسیب شناسی اجتمـاعی (جامعـه شناسـی انحرافات). چاپ دوم. تهران:انتشارات سمت.
قاضی نژاد، مریم و عباسیان، ماریا. (1390). مطالعه کیفی عوامل اجتماعی همسرکشی. نشریه زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان). 9(33): 102–71 . 
قطعنامه 104/ 48 مورخ 20 دسامبر 1993 مجمع عمومی، سند 107. 13. کمالی پور راوری، الهه. (بهار 1395). بررسی علل و عوامل وقوع قتل در جنوب استان کرمان. فصلنامه دانش انتظامی کرمان. 15(1): 134- 118.
محمدی اصل، عباس. (1385). بزهکاری نوجوانان و نظریه‌های انحراف اجتماعی. تهران: نشر علم.
معظمی، شهلا. (1383). جرم شناسی خشونت خانگی و همسرکشی در سیستان و بلوچستان. نشریه زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان).2(2): 53- 39.
وحیدا، فریدون؛ سبزه، حسینعلی و ذاکری، حامد. (1394). تحلیل و بررسی کیفی عوامل مؤثر بر همسرکشی در بین زنان و مردان (مطالعه موردی زندانیان اصفهان). فصلنامه بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران (نامه علوم اجتماعی).6(1): 214- 193.
معین الدینی، زهرا؛ سهرابی، فرامرز؛ دلاور، علی وکریم نژاد نیارق، سعید. (1393). مقایسه سبک هویتی و میزان شیوع اختلالات روانی در زنان زندانی بر اساس نوع جرم. فصلنامه مطالعات زن و خانواده.1(2): 149-131. 
مفرادنژاد، ناهید؛ منادی، مرتضی. (1399). ارتباط سرمایه های روان شناختی و فرهنگی با خشونت خانگی در زنان متأهل(مورد مطالعه: فرهنگیان بهبهان). فصلنامه مطالعات زن و خانواده. 1(8): 213-189.
References
Aldridge, M., Brown, K. (2003). Perpetrators of Spousal homicide: A Review Trauma, Violence & Abuse. 4(3): 265-276.    
Ashoori, M., Moazami, SH. (2002). Look at the Phenomenon of the spousal murder in Fars province. Law Quarterly,Faculty of law and political science, university of Tehran. 58(0):11-32 (text in persion).
Astion, M. (2009). Massachusetts Intimate Partner Homicide Review, Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Research and Policy Analysis Division.
Agnew, R. (1992). “Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency”. Criminology. 30(1): 47-87.
Easy, E.(2015). Sociological explanation of family murder with special reference on spousal murder (among youths). Research Bureau of the policeforce of Northern Khorasan province net work services.7(2).81-100 (text in persion).
Ghazi Nejad, M., Abasian, M.(2011). Qualitative study of social factors of Spousal Homicide. Journal of woman in Development and Policy. 9(33): 71-102 (text in persion).
Gelles, R., Straus., M.A. (1988). Intimate violence. The Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family. New York , Simon & Shuster.
Meyer, E., Post, L. (2013). Collateral Intimate Partner Homicide. Sage open 3(2): 1-11.
Moazami, SH. (2004 ). Criminology of Domestic Violence and Homicide in Sistan and Baluchestan. Journal of woman in Development and Policy.2(2): 39-53 (text in persion).
Mofradnejad, N., Monadi, M.(2020). The relationship of psychological capital and cultural capital with domestic violence in married women. Journal of woman and family studies.1(8): 189-213 (text in persion).
Moinoddini, Z., Faramarz, S., Delavar, A & Karimnejad Nayaregh, S. (2014). Comparison of identitiy style and the prevalence of mental disorders in women prisoners according to the type of crime. Journal of woman and family studies.1(2): 131-149 (text in persion).
Stone, L. (1979). The revival of narrative: reflections on a new old history, Past and present: 3-24.
Vahida, F., Hossein Ali, S & Hamed, Z. (2015).The Qualitative analysis of influencing factors on mariticide between women and men (case syudy). Iranian Journal of Social Issues.6(1): 193-214(text in persion).
Vatnar, S., Friestad, C. (2018). Differences in intimate partner homicides perpetrated by men and women: evidence from a Norwegian National 22-year cohort. Journal Psychology, Crime & Law 24(8): 790-805.
Zokaei, S. (2008). Narrative, Narratology and Autobiographical analyses. Journal of the Humanities and social sciences .1(8).69-98.
Zara, G., Gino, S. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence and its Escalation Into Femicide. Frailty why Name Is “Violence Against Women, Frontiers in Psychology 9. Article 1777 : 1-11.