مردان و واگذاری وکالت در طلاق: پیامدها از منظر صاحب نظران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دکترای مطالعات زنان

2 دانشگاه باقرالعلوم علیه السلام

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف دست‌یابی به «پیامدهای واگذاری شرط توکیل در طلاق از جانب مردان» به منزله‌ی یک پدیده‌ی اجتماعی انجام شده است. داده‌های مورد نیاز این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و تکنیک مصاحبه نیمه-ساختاریافته گردآوری و با روش تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شده است. با توجه به ملاحظات نظری، واگذاری وکالت مرد در طلاق تمام ابعاد حیات آنان را تحت‌الشعاع خویش قرار داده، ضمن اینکه می‌تواند مثبت یا منفی تلقی گردد. بسترهای درخواست اخذ شرط از منظر مصاحبه‌شوندگان حقوقی، فرهنگی ـ اجتماعی بوده و براساس یافته-های تحقیق، کارشناسان عواملی مانند اطاله‌دادرسی قضایی، برداشت فمینیستی، شکل‌گیری منیّت در زندگی، ناکامی‌های حقوقی، قدرت‌طلبی، بی‌اعتمادی اجتماعی، ضرورت‌های اجتماعی، بزرگ‌منشی متظاهرانه، ناامنی روحی و خودتنظیمی در زندگی را از جمله بسترهای شکل دهنده این پدید می‌دانند. همچنین نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که پیامدهای مثبت معطوف به مردان از دیدگاه کارشناسان، واگذاری شرط در ازای بذل مهریه که دِین مرد تلقی می‌گردد، بسیاری از مشکلات را حل می‌نماید. همچنین آثار منفی معطوف به مردان، فروگذاری تعهد اقتصادی، اقتدارزدایی خاموش، تله‌رهاشدگی، مخفی‌کاری و تظاهر اخلاقی، ناامنی روانی و محدودیت‌بخشی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Men and Delegation in Divorce: Consequences from the Point of View of Experts

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedeh Alieh Azartoos 1
  • Nematullah Karamollahi 2

1 Phd

2 Member of the faculty of Baqir al-Alum (AS)

چکیده [English]

۱۰۶۸/۵۰۰۰
The present study was conducted with the aim of achieving "the consequences of divulging the tax condition on the part of men" as a social phenomenon. The data needed for this study was collected by qualitative approach and semi-structured interview technique and analyzed by thematic analysis method. According to theoretical considerations, the assignment of the rights of the husband to divorce all aspects of their life, and can be regarded as positive or negative. The conditions for requesting the condition from the perspective of legal interviewers are social and based on the findings of the research, experts have identified factors such as judicial review, feminist conception, the formation of life in man, legal failures, power struggle, Social trust, social necessities, supreme magnanimity, spiritual insecurity and self-regulation in life constitute one of the foundations of this formation. Also, the results of the research show that positive outcomes toward men from the point of view of experts, the assignment of a condition in exchange for a dowry that man's religion conveys, solves many problems. It also has negative effects on men, economic downturn, silent de-regulation, trapping, covertness and moral expression, psychological insecurity, and limitation

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Divorce
  • "divorce law
  • " condition
  • "divorce consequences
  • " qualitative study
  1.  

    1. Abbott, Pamela. wallace.(2004) Claire.,Socicology of weman, translated by M. Najm Araghi, Tehran, Nashr ney. (Text in Persian)
    2. Bostan, H., (2015), Family sociology with a look at Islamic sources, Qom, Paghoheshgah Hawzeh & Daneshgah. (Text in Persian)
    3. Buric, &Zecevic,A,(1967) “Family Authority, Marital satisfaction and the social network in Yugoslavia, Jouranal of marriage and the family, v20.
    4. Corbin, J. and A. Strauss (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research, Third Edition, London: Sage Publications Inc.
    5. Dayyani, A., (2007), Divorce counseling is a way of modifying the right to unilaterally dissolve the marriage contract, Faslname Hoghoogh, No.3 (Text in Persian)
    6. Jafari, M.T.,( 1981), Translation and Interpretation of Nahj al-Balagha, Tehran, Daftare Nashr Farhang Islami, Vo.11 (Text in Persian)
    7. Jalali, S. M., (2014), Delegation of divorce to the wife in Islamic jurisprudence, Fighh moqaran, Vo.4. (Text in Persian)
    8. Jalali, S. M., (2014), Family rights (marriage and dissolution), Tehran, Khossandi, , vo. 1(Text in Persian)
    9. Julius Gould, Kolb & Wiliam L. (1997), Social Science Culture, Translated by Bagher parham & others, Tehran, Maziyar. ,(Text in Persian)
    10. Kolahan, K., (2005), Representation of women in divorce, Nashriyeh zane rooz, No., Bahman,(Text in Persian)
    11. Koleini, M. ibn Y., (1407) Al-Kafi, Tehran, Dar alkutub Islamiyyeh, Vo.5
    12. Makarim shirazi, N. (1995), Tafsir Nemooneh, Tehran, Dar al-kotob al-Islamiye,Vo. 7,(Text in Persian)
    13. Makarim shirazi, N. (1995), Tafsir Nemooneh, Tehran, Dar al-kotob al-Islamiye, Vo. 3,(Text in Persian)
    14. Malekian, M, (2000), Faslname Baztab Andishe, No.4,(Text in Persian)
    15. Malekian, Z., (2008), Check the condition of substitution wife in divorce, Qom, Daneshgah Mofid. ,(Text in Persian)
    16. Mehrpoor, H. (2000), Check different juristic and legal status of women and men in divorce, Pazhoohish Name Mofid, No. 21, (Text in Persian)
    17. Mesbah, M.T.(2007),Ethics in Quran, Qom, Moa’sese A’moozishi pazhooheshi Imam Khomeini, Vo. 3,(Text in Persian)
    18. Miller Richard, (2008) who is the Boss? Power relationships in Families, provo,Utah Brigham young university.
    19. Mohammadpoor, A., (2011), Qualitative research methods, antiMethod 1, Tehran, Jamie shenasan,(Text in Persian)
    20. Mojtahid shabestary, M., (2002), A criticism of the official reading of religion, Tehran, Tarhe no, Vo.1,(Text in Persian)
    21. Motahari, M., (2009), The rights of women in Islam, Tehran, Sadra,(Text in Persian)
    22. Najafzade, A., (2011) Representation and delegation of divorce to the wife in public law, Hoghoogh Iran & Mesr, Daneshgah Imam Sadiq(A) ,(Text in Persian)
    23. Noori Tabrasi, H. ibn M.T. (1408gh), Mostadrak al-vasaael & Mostanbat al-masaael, Qom, A’l al-bayt, Vo.15, (Text in Persian)
    24. Noori Tabrasi, H. ibn M.T. (1408gh), Mostadrak al-vasaael & Mostanbat al-masaael, Qom, A’l al-bayt, Vo. 14,(Text in Persian)
    25. Quran
    26. Rayegan, M., (2014), Legal Jurisprudence Review of Divorce Law on Divorce, Faslname Marifat hooghoghi, N.3(Text in Persian)
    27. Research: Why, When and Who to Use Qualitative Methods in theStudy of Adolescent Health", Journal of Adolescent Health, 25: 371 – 378.
    28. Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K. (1999) "The Reason and Theme of Qualitative
    29. Roodijani, M.M., (2010), Lawyer in Divorce, Tehran, Ketab Ava. (Text in Persian)
    30. Safayee, S. H. (1981), Legal-Jurisprudential Examination of Tavakol Woman in Divorce, Majalleh Danishkade Hoghoogh & Uloome siyasi, no. 22(Text in Persian)
    31. Safayee, S. H. (1996), Attorney for divorce and assignment of divorce, Tehran, nashr Mizan. (Text in Persian)
    32. Shoraye A’li Hawzeh Ilmiyyeh, Markaz Modiriyat Hawzeh Ilmiyyeh Khaharan,(2009) , Feminism and Feminist Knowledge, Qom, Khatam ul anbiya.
    33. Soroosh, A, (Bita), Theoretical Expansion of the Law, Bija, Moasise Farhangi serat. (Text in Persian)
    34. Soyooti, J. A., (1404gh), Ad-dorro al manthoor, Qom, Mnashoorat maktabat al Uthma Al Mar’shi, vo.2(Text in Persian)
    35. Tababayee, S. M. H., (1417), Almizan fi tafsir al-Quran, daftare Intesharate Islami, Vo.4 (Text in Persian)
    36. Tabarasi, F Ibn. H., (1981), tarjome Majma’ al-bayan fi tafsir al-Quran, Tehran, Intesharat farahani, Vo.5(Text in Persian)
    37. Wallace Ruth A & Wolf Alison, (1986) contemporary sociology Theory prentice Hall,newyork.
    38. Zibayee nezhad, M.R., M.T. Sobhani, (2009) An Introduction to the System of Female Personality in Islam, Qom, Daftare Motalia’t & Tahqiqat Zan,(Text in Persian)