fertility challenges in educated women with three or more children and motivational strategies

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular

Authors

1 Department of Women study, Faculty of Economics & Social Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Women and Family Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Iran, Tehran

Abstract

Population and its changes have long been one of the most important and vital issues of a country. According to the latest data from the Statistics Center, the fertility rate has reached 1.7, which means less than the replacement level, which shows that we are facing the challenge of population decline. Changes in women's lifestyles and attitudes are one of the most important factors affecting the issue of fertility. In this study, the challenges of fertility in women with three children were investigated. The aim of this study was to find the motivating factors for fertility. The research was qualitative and phenomenological. For this purpose, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 mothers aged 26-42 years, who had three or more children and were selected by snowball sampling method. According to the analysis of the findings, three main categories of barriers to fertility, motivating factors for fertility and expectations to facilitate fertility and 10 sub-categories and more than 100 concepts were obtained. In general, it can be concluded that people have large numbers of children according to their religious beliefs, and in this way, the material and spiritual support received from both families can be a helpful factor. Also, the accompanying help of the wife in household chores and caring for the children to the mother was an important and effective issue.

Highlights

The population crisis is currently one of the main challenges in the country. Given that women play an essential role in changes in fertility rates, the study focuses on their challenges with fertility issues. Therefore, in this study, women with three or more children in Tehran concerned about continuing their education were studied to explore the issues affecting childbearing and the motivating factors. The extracted categories were classified as obstacles to childbearing, motivating factors for childbearing, and expectations to facilitate childbearing. The sub-categories of barriers to having children were the cultural view of the society, the mother’s medical condition, economic issues, and governance policies. The economy was one of the most important factors that concerned women and their families and posed obstacles. They anticipated that the government would take action in this area and provide assistance to families with a large number of children, which is partly consistent with the findings of Abdullahi and Farjadi (2015), Daliri (2017), Mazinani and Mohamadian (2022). It was consistent with one of Rafii Moghadam and Ashtiani’s (2019) research findings that the economic and social middle class had a larger desire to have children, as the majority of the participants in the interviews were families from this class. Therefore, it cannot be argued that economic factors were the primary influence on these families’ reproductive decisions because those interviewed were persons who, according to themselves, have three or more children while having a moderate or low salary and rented home. They expressed a wish to have additional children. In these instances, it can be claimed that economic theories of fertility were relatively inadequate.

 

Motivational factors for childbearing that were extracted according to interviews were religious beliefs, family support, economic satisfaction, and maternal priority. Religious beliefs were one of the most influential factors in encouraging families to have children; this finding was consistent with the results of Modiri research (2017) and Rezvani et al. (2020), which indicated that beliefs cause a positive attitude towards childbearing and increased childbearing. Most women talked about the support of those around them, such as their families, mothers, and spouses. Their spouses, who often had higher education, had a transcendent view of the division of domestic work and assisted their spouses in various housekeeping and parenting tasks as far as they could afford. The women also said there was a good relationship between their children and their fathers, which made them content. It can be said that this effect of a father’s participation in childbearing is consistent with the results of research by Razeghi Nasrabad et al. (2021) and Esther and Profeta (2020) on its positive effect on childbearing and the theory of gender equality.

The findings on the positive impact of family support on childcare are also similar to that of Wang and Zhao (2021) in China. Motherhood was a priority for the interviewees, and they had a positive view of their traditional duty as a mother and a wife at home. They also viewed doing their homework as their duty and viewed it as a factor in encouraging childbearing, which was consistent with the findings of Chamani et al. (2016), who believed that the loss of traditional female identity was a factor in reducing childbearing. This study’s interviews were conducted during the outbreak of Covid 19 disease, which, because of limits on travel and face-to-face visits, prevented the opinions from being viewed in person and, to some extent, diminished the quality of the research. The time limitation allowed us to focus exclusively on Tehran women with three or more children. In addition, according to the snowball sampling method, the selected individuals were generally on the same ideological spectrum, which was one of the research’s weaknesses. In light of the limitations of this study, it is recommended that the entire country’s statistical population of women with three or more children be investigated and that quantitative research be used to achieve generalizable conclusions. In this study, none of the economic theories of fertility could adequately explain the findings. There is a need for scholars to examine all facets of financial concerns and give particular attention to other factors, such as religious and cultural issues.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Dickson, M. (2006). Employment, family union, and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(4), 781-804.  [Link]
Abbasi Shavazi, M. (2002). The convergence of the fertility behaviors in Iran: The provincial fertility levels and patterns during 1972-1996. Nameh-Ye Olum-E Ejtemai, New. (text in Persian). [Link]
Abdollahi, A., & Farjadi, G. (2017). Socio-Economic Rationality and Childbearing Behavior in Tehran City: Results from a Qualitative Study Iranian. population studies journal, 2(2), 101-131. (text in Persian) [Link]
Barzegari Bafghi, K., Mughli, M. (2019). Investigating the impact of the age pyramid on Iran’s economy. New research of geographical sciences, Architecture, and urban planning. 3(24), 75-102. [link].
Basten, S., Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Abassi-Shavazi, M. J., Adsera, A., Van Bavel, J., ... & Zhao, Z. (2014). Future fertility in low fertility countries. ISBN: 978-0-19-870316-7 [Link]
Behjati Ardakani, Z., & Abbasi Shavazi, M., & Shidfar, F., & Moeini, M., & Akhoundi, M. (2007). The effect of aging on natural and artificial reproduction. Payesh, 6(4), 331-345. (text in Persian) [Link]
Chamani, S., & Shekarbeigi, A., & Moshfegh, M. (2016). Sociological determinants of fertility (case study: married women living in Tehran). The socio-cultural strategy journal, 5(20), 137-165. (text in Persian) [Link]
Creswell, John W.(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed.
Dorahaki, A., Nobakht, R. (2020). The Influence of Gender Equality within the Family on Fertility Intention of Women in Urban Areas of Bushehr Province. Woman in Development & Politics, 18(1), 151-172. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2020.294291.1007761(text in Persian) [Link]
Douglass, B. G., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022167885253004. [Link]
Eshaghi, M., Mohebi, S., Papynezhad, S., Jahandar, Z. (2014). Childbearing Challenges for Working Women; a Qualitative Study. Woman in Development & Politics, 12(1), 111-134. doi: 10.22059/jwdp.2014.51356 (text in Persian). [Link]
Fanelli, E., & Profeta, P. (2021). Fathers’ Involvement in the Family, Fertility, and Maternal Employment: Evidence From Central and Eastern Europe. Demography, 58(5), 1931–1954. [link].
Fathi, E., Javaid, N.M., Hosseini, Se M., Mirzaei, S., Nasiripour, M. (2018). Investigating the trend of changes in the structure and composition of the country’s population and its future until the horizon of 1430 AD based on the results of the 1395 general population and housing census. Journal of the national portal of statistics[link]
Gauthier, A. H., & Philipov, D. (2008). Can policies enhance fertility in Europe?. Vienna yearbook of population research, 1-16. [link]
Ghodrati H., Bustani D., Ghodrati A., Kalali S.A. A Study of the Relationship between Gender Equality in the Family and Women’s Fertility Case Study: Married Women aged 20 to 40 in Sabzevar. Geographical studies of arid regions. 3 (11): 91-75 (text in Persian). [Link]
Gu, H., Bian, F., & Elahi, E. (2021). Impact of availability of grandparents’ care on birth in working women: An empirical analysis based on data of Chinese dynamic labor force. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105859. [Link]
Iran Statistics Center (2019). The downward slope of Iran’s total fertility rate from 1396 to 98. Iran Statistics Center. [link]
Inglehart, R. F., Ponarin, E., & Inglehart, R. C. (2017). Cultural change, slow and fast: The distinctive trajectory of norms governing gender equality and sexual orientation. Social Forces, 95(4), 1313-1340.  [Link]
Mehrbani, V. (2014). A Comparative Study of Economic Schools of Fertility by Using Data from Iran. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 8(16), 5-27.[link]
Mahmoudi MJ, Kazemipour, S.H , Ahrari, N. , Nikoonesbati A. (2017). A Comparative Study on the Effect of Religiosity and Gender Attitudes on the Childbearing Intention by Gender in Tehran. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 9(32), 171-202. doi: 10.22054/qjsd.2017.8429. (text in Persian) [Link]
Nasiri, F., Abdolmaleki, S. (2017). Explaining the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life, Perceived Stress Mediator Role in Female-Headed Households in Sanandaj. Journal of Applied Sociology, 27(4), 99-116. doi: 10.22108/jas.2017.21163 (text in Persian). [Link]
Nock, S. L. (1987). The symbolic meaning of childbearing. Journal of Family Issues, 8(4), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019251387008004004. [Link]
Ojaghlo, S., Saraie, H. (2014). A study of Temporal changes of a child value in Iran (Zanjan city women). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3(2), 261-283. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2014.53139 (text in Persian) [Link]
Parvari, P. (2019). The transition from philosophy to methodology, a new reading of the phenomenology method: the foundation of philosophical approaches and implementation steps. Sociological studies, 12
(44), 87-106. doi: 10.30495/jss.2019.669587(text in Persian) [Link]
Rad, F., Savabi, H. (2015). Investigation on Tendency to Fertility and its Related Social Factors (A Case Study of Married Women Aged 15 to 50 in Tabriz). Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 3(1), 127-155. doi: 10.22051/jwfs.2015.2199(text in Persian) [Link]
Rafiei Moqaddam, F., Fathi Ashtiani, A. (2021). Discovery of the Factors Inhibiting Couples from Childbearing in the Last Decade (A Systematic Review). The Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 15(53), 155-175. (text in Persian) [Link]
Razeghi Nasrabad, H., Hosseini Chavoshi, M., Abbasi Shavazi, M. (2021). The Effects of Gender Role Attitudes and Role Division on the Second Birth Interval in Tehran. Journal of Applied Sociology, 32(2), 1-28. doi: 10.22108/jas.2020.121730.1875(text in Persian) [Link]
Shojaei, J., yazdkhasti, B. (2017). A systematic review of studies of fertility decline in the last two decades. Women’s Strategic Studies, 19(75 (spring 2017)), 137-159. doi: 10.22095/jwss.2017.51750 (text in Persian) [Link]
Sikorska, M. (2021). Is it possible to increase the fertility rate in Poland. IBS Policy paper, 4, 2021. https://ibs.org.pl/app/uploads/2021/05/Is-it-possible-to-increase-the-fertility-rate-in-Poland.pdf. [Link]
Statistical Centre of Iran(2018). Selected Findings of the 2016 National Population and Housing Census(2018). Statistical Centre of Iran. (text in Persian)[Link].
Tamanneifar, M., & Leys, H., & Mansourinik, A. (2013). The relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy among high school students. Journal of social psychology (new findings in psychology), 8(28), 31-39. (text in Persian). [Link]
Tavousi, M.,  Esmaeil Motlagh, M, Eslami, M, Haerimehrizi, Aliasghar, H, Akram,  Montazeri, A.(2016). Fertility desire among Iranians living in Tehran: reasons for desire and disinterest. Payesh. 15 (6) :663-668(text in Persian) [Link]
Torabi, F., sheidani, R. (2019). A Study of Effective Factors in Tendency to Fewer Childbearing of 15-49 Year old Women Residents of Tehran. Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 7(2), 31-67. doi: 10.22051/jwfs.2017.15078.1437(text in Persain). [Link]
Wang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2021). Grandparental Childcare and Second Birth in China: Evidence from a Dynamic Model and Empirical Study. Complexity.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6693853. [Link]